Strategic Studies Quarterly

Abstract In order to serve citizen rights, the police as the main responsible organization to maintain domestic security have to carry out some jobs which, right or wrong, are called interference in freedom, security or other citizen rights.To solve this problem which actually demonstrates a conflict of functions, a deeply surveyed and targeted training of citizen rights is needed. Therefore, the police efficiency is subject to training citizen rights to its personnel and other citizens too. Training and enlightening public opinion about citizen rights and the way to secure it can take away some misunderstandings in this regard. Training the police about citizen rights also can lead its personnel not to interfere in the rights of citizens, even if they are the accused or criminals. Therefore, the police efficiency in securing citizen rights will be increased.

Abstract Since the mid 1970s we have witnessed adoption of remarkable number of agreements on support and encouragement of bilateral foreign investments between the Islamic Republic of Iran and other countries.Although this has been welcomed by many countries, due to some challenges in adoption and implementation of this kind of agreements, they have not been concurred equally. The challenge lies in the fact that within these agreements, two national expediencies are facing each other: the necessity of growth and development and cooperation with others on one hand, and the necessity of control and preserving public and governmental assets in order to prevent domination of foreigners on national resources and interests. The above- said laws is a forum to link these two expediencies.This paper aims to answer the question that how the Constitution and the domestic laws of the Islamic Republic ofIranand the agreements of bilateral foreign investments can link the two expediencies.    

Abstract Ph. D Candidate of Private Law at theUniversityofTehran   The article 139 of the Constitution of the I. R. of Iran the aim of which is protecting the public and governmental properties, has envisaged rules to realize this end in case of a legal dispute. However, some of domestic as well as foreign investors believe that the aim of this article is incompatible with the principal of swiftness at trade issues, because, capital absorbing and other types of trade are among indispensable needs of economic advancement. Therefore, linking between the above two expediencies, i.e. protecting public and governmental properties and swiftness at trade and absorbing of capital is very important. To coupe with this challenge, it would be better to find capacities of this article due to legislation and legal analysis based on national expedience.    

Abstract By increasing international commitments and organizations in international trade law more over more and having to do with members to enforcing regulations of international documents, states is trying to joint and entrance in that institutions for keeping away in logical and economic isolation. It could not be proper respond to that is it preparing the IR of Iran for entrancing in them or not. For example, by examining ICSID, MIGA, WTO, ECT entail different regulations in international trade could be fund opportunities and challenges to joint and obligation on this international trade for ours.

Abstract Global significance of gas and oil as the main energy sources was ever caused to crises, conflicts and regional and global coalitions, too. By the dependency of macro economy in Iran to petroleum industry and for confronting to economic, political and security – legal challenges, obligations and limitations, it is necessary that we chose the best mechanism for exploiting of this strategy goods. The buy-back as a legal mechanism due to focus on nationalization of the oil industry, constitutional and customary law enactment, being the capital investment limitation, and absence of high technology in oil industry, would be with positive and negative characteristics for Iran. For improving the positive and reducing the negative of the treaty for safeguarding our national interest, it is better to discuss the nature of the buy-back and examining the parties' commitments and obligations. Working the modern manner of law would not be worthy for protecting the national sources, ecological environment and national interest; so with the long term view and awareness the Iranian side (party) could be reduce the cost of the treaty as possible.