Strategic Studies Quarterly

Abstract Before and after the election, Joe Biden has stated that one of his foreign policy
priorities is to formulate and pursue a new US policy towards Iran. At the heart of
Biden's "Iranian politics" is his return to JCPOA. However, there are ambiguities about
nature and quality of this policy and also USA return to JCPOA. Therefore, this article
tries to answer this question: What are the nature, components and coordinates of
Biden's foreign policy towards Iran and what will it be like? By documentary study
method and analyzing the speeches, letters, and statements made by Biden and his
foreign policy team, it is argued that Biden's foreign policy discourse is "liberal
internationalism." His nuclear policy is also based on a thematic and step-by-step link
to return to the JCPOA in the first step, strengthen and expand its provisions and
extend its time in the second step, and finally extend it to the missile program and
Iran's regional influence in the third step.

Abstract  The Saudi Arabia political and legal system is somehow consistent with the Sharia and tradition and so there is no room for human rights. The individual in this country is within the foundational and comprehensive concepts based in tradition and so human rights cannot challenge the society in future. The same perspective is the case with regards to secular or religious legal system of the country as it is consistent enough with the social and cultural espatial of the Arab peninsula and it doesn’t need the legislation or legislator. However, the recent regional developments have emerged human rights as a threat against Saudi Arabia; a country in which the rights of its minority Shiite groups along with women’s and the children right  are being raised especially in the war in Yemen.
 

Abstract The UNDP 1994 report introduced a new security approach called as “human security” that protects human being with all possible needs. Concurrent with this initiative and given the UNSC reaction against developments in Rwanda and Kosovo, the “responsibility to Protect” doctrine emerged as a new concept. Due to these new developments, the paper aims to answer the question that what the role of responsibility to protect is in ensuring human security? And whether the human security can be a proper base to realization of responsibility to protect?.

Abstract In order to serve citizen rights, the police as the main responsible organization to maintain domestic security have to carry out some jobs which, right or wrong, are called interference in freedom, security or other citizen rights.To solve this problem which actually demonstrates a conflict of functions, a deeply surveyed and targeted training of citizen rights is needed. Therefore, the police efficiency is subject to training citizen rights to its personnel and other citizens too. Training and enlightening public opinion about citizen rights and the way to secure it can take away some misunderstandings in this regard. Training the police about citizen rights also can lead its personnel not to interfere in the rights of citizens, even if they are the accused or criminals. Therefore, the police efficiency in securing citizen rights will be increased.

Abstract After Occupation of Afghanestan andIraqfollowing september 11 events, Unintentionally United States has enhanced the Position of Islamic Republic of Iran in the region. This unintentional consequence and Iran's attempt for achiving to nuclear energy, has forced America by overstating the threat of Iran for the region, to exploit from existed divides and paradoxes in the middle east for containment and underminng Islamic Republic of Iran. Accordingly, there woruld be a kind of convergence between America, Europe, Isreal, Arab States and sunni foundamentalists opposit Iran and shitte groups in Iraq and south lebanon that it is a threat against interests and national security of Islamic Republic of Iran.

Abstract Meetings and demonstrations are instruments of acquiring logical right such as the expressive, the equality, and other rights contained in the human rights and the IR of constitution in its collective manifestation. So in the right of establishing meetings, whenever it doesn't occurrence any illegality, there isn't any legal and rational legitimating for inhibiting it.Getting safe and legal meeting and without any formal limitation to celebrating it could be a way of preparing the security and the freedom of citizens, saving the national security by referring to citizen's claims. By examining the domestic regulations author is searching to analyzing the nature of the meetings and showing how could be manage them before celebrating in one side and emerging illegal behavior in other side?

Abstract This article explains the principles and rules governing the restrictions on the application of rights and freedoms. The bases of such principles and rules are more possible to explain and analyze by exploring the history of the codification of human rights instruments on the one hand and their influence in the domestic law order on the other. Hence, the author tries to describe, define and explore the extent of the universal application of human rights category. Human rights can be viewed as rights that people enjoy simply because of their humanity. This moral outlook justifies their claim to universality, despite the existence of all cultural, social and economic differences among nations. Emphasizing this universality, this article extrapolates three principles specifying the restrictions placed on the application of rights and freedoms by the states in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms which include: “provided for by law,” “pursuing a legitimate objective,” and “necessary for a democratic society.” Although there can be found certain cases restricting human rights and the principles governing their application in the important international instruments, the aforementioned provisions have been formulated more clearly and suitably in the European Convention on Human Rights.