<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Research Institute of Strategic Studies (RISS)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Strategic Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0727</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>37</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Doctrin, Policy and Strategy; Theoretical and Conceptual Comparability</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Doctrin, Policy and Strategy; Theoretical and Conceptual Comparability</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>423</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>450</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1075</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Khalili</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-1279-8737</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In Public and Political Circles and even in most scientific debates, sometimes the concepts of doctrines, policy and strategy have been applied so intertwined and with close meanings that distinguishing between their conceptual and theoretical boundaries have become a foundamental problem. In fact, theoretical and conceptual interference and ambiguity between doctrine, policy and strategy is a considerable scientific issue that must be taken into account In this article, while establishing a connection between these concepts and the concept of security, there is an attempts toward designing a theoretical boundaries between them. Accordingly, the auther triees to reassess the assumptions regarding ambiguity of security concept and interference of boundaries of security studies. In this basis, it can be said that security is a theoretical context and denomination of doctrine, policy and strategy.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In Public and Political Circles and even in most scientific debates, sometimes the concepts of doctrines, policy and strategy have been applied so intertwined and with close meanings that distinguishing between their conceptual and theoretical boundaries have become a foundamental problem. In fact, theoretical and conceptual interference and ambiguity between doctrine, policy and strategy is a considerable scientific issue that must be taken into account In this article, while establishing a connection between these concepts and the concept of security, there is an attempts toward designing a theoretical boundaries between them. Accordingly, the auther triees to reassess the assumptions regarding ambiguity of security concept and interference of boundaries of security studies. In this basis, it can be said that security is a theoretical context and denomination of doctrine, policy and strategy.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Security</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Doctrine</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Policy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">strategy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Security Studies</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_1075_46072631582fc240dd2674a7d063b040.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
