<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Research Institute of Strategic Studies (RISS)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Strategic Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0727</Issn>
				<Volume>24</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Vulnerabilities of securitizing challenges of internal affairs; A case study of social networks</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Vulnerabilities of securitizing challenges of internal affairs; A case study of social networks</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>7</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>32</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">139315</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Rassool</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zarezadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>..</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>30</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Securitizing theory is one of the most widely used and controversial contemporary security theories that has been used by researchers to explain various security phenomena and actions. This article seeks to apply and implement this theory in the field of neglected and less used internal security by examining a case study of securitizing social networks in the Islamic Republic of Iran based on the library-documentary research method. While acknowledging that securitizing internal issues are more difficult than external issues, the author believes that issues such as the multiplicity of decision-making actors and ambiguity in the competence of security-building actors, poor framing and proper depiction of threats, neglection or lack of attention to social context, audience diversity, inadequate policy-making and Desecuritizing are the most important factors that has challenged securitizing of social networks in the Islamic Republic of Iran.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Securitizing theory is one of the most widely used and controversial contemporary security theories that has been used by researchers to explain various security phenomena and actions. This article seeks to apply and implement this theory in the field of neglected and less used internal security by examining a case study of securitizing social networks in the Islamic Republic of Iran based on the library-documentary research method. While acknowledging that securitizing internal issues are more difficult than external issues, the author believes that issues such as the multiplicity of decision-making actors and ambiguity in the competence of security-building actors, poor framing and proper depiction of threats, neglection or lack of attention to social context, audience diversity, inadequate policy-making and Desecuritizing are the most important factors that has challenged securitizing of social networks in the Islamic Republic of Iran.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Security</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Securitizing</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Internal Security</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Social Networks</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Security-building</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Desecuritizing</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_139315_7a596bf1f5d8a668ebd3c6487b37b33a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
