<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Research Institute of Strategic Studies (RISS)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Strategic Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0727</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>56</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Transformation of secrecy: from ontological characteristic to an instrument for intelligence operations</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Transformation of secrecy: from ontological characteristic to an instrument for intelligence operations</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>67</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>90</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2409</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Gholamreza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Salarkia</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>11</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This article, after a brief review of causes of secrecy in state administrations, especially in intelligence agencies, tries to describe secrecy’s status in the identity of intelligence. Author, in response to the question of research, has two competing hypothesis. The main hypothesis argues that secrecy is an ontological characteristic of intelligence. In contrast, the second hypothesis describes secrecy an instrument of intelligence operations. After arguments for and against the hypoethses, author concludes that secrecy is indispensible part to intelligence and must be considefed as an ontological characteristic.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This article, after a brief review of causes of secrecy in state administrations, especially in intelligence agencies, tries to describe secrecy’s status in the identity of intelligence. Author, in response to the question of research, has two competing hypothesis. The main hypothesis argues that secrecy is an ontological characteristic of intelligence. In contrast, the second hypothesis describes secrecy an instrument of intelligence operations. After arguments for and against the hypoethses, author concludes that secrecy is indispensible part to intelligence and must be considefed as an ontological characteristic.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Secrecy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Openness</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Classification</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">departmentalization</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ontological characteristic</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">secrecy as an instrument</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_2409_b3f61131b6eceeb2b14835fa648a48ff.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
