<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Research Institute of Strategic Studies (RISS)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Strategic Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0727</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>34</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Ideology and Strategy: Conceptual Comparison between the Ideological and Strategic Perspective</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Ideology and Strategy: Conceptual Comparison between the Ideological and Strategic Perspective</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>759</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>789</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">964</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Khalili</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-1279-8737</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2006</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Categories of ideology and strategy independently was examined and defined in many works, but surveying the relationship of these categories didn&#039;t just adequate by current independent studies. For acute comparison between ideological and strategic view, it is necessity to explore their historical origins, their whole characteristics and functions and also responding the any non- academic prejudice about them. In this article by examining of the historical, the conceptual, the functional, of each category, it is criticizing the dichotomy of definitions of them that in the one side ideology is defined as idealism, morals, changeability, emotionalism, false consciousness, and non-cognitive view and the other side strategy is introduced as realism, ethical impartiality, verification, rationality, true consciousness and scientific knowledge.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Categories of ideology and strategy independently was examined and defined in many works, but surveying the relationship of these categories didn&#039;t just adequate by current independent studies. For acute comparison between ideological and strategic view, it is necessity to explore their historical origins, their whole characteristics and functions and also responding the any non- academic prejudice about them. In this article by examining of the historical, the conceptual, the functional, of each category, it is criticizing the dichotomy of definitions of them that in the one side ideology is defined as idealism, morals, changeability, emotionalism, false consciousness, and non-cognitive view and the other side strategy is introduced as realism, ethical impartiality, verification, rationality, true consciousness and scientific knowledge.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ideology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ideological View</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">strategy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Strategic View</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_964_8065d07da4a77621450aa84fee5656d9.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
