Research Institute of Strategic Studies (RISS)Strategic Studies Quarterly1735-072724320211122Assessment of National Security Coefficient of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Introduction of NAZEM Model)Assessment of National Security Coefficient of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Introduction of NAZEM Model)730141361FAAbdul MahmoudMohammadi LordMehdiMir MohammadiJournal Article20210829In this research, an attempt has been made to provide a model for assessing the national security coefficient of the Islamic Republic of Iran based on the topics in the Year Book of National Security, which focus on national security issues. For this purpose, content analysis strategy, decision tree logic and network analysis method were used and a conceptual model called "NAZAM" model was introduced, which includes four dimensions and consists of the initials of each dimension, which include insecure factors, security. The results of this study showed that the system's capacity dimension plays a role in the national security coefficient of the Islamic Republic of Iran more than other dimensions. Therefore, if the overall national security strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is focused on increasing capacity, it will have a greater impact than the strategy to deal with insecure factors. Increasing the level of efficiency of the political system, improving the interaction between the three powers, increasing the political trust and social capital of the government, increasing the level of production, repairing the electoral system and increasing Iran's consensus-building power in international organizations, more than control and countermeasures against insecure factors will increase national security.In this research, an attempt has been made to provide a model for assessing the national security coefficient of the Islamic Republic of Iran based on the topics in the Year Book of National Security, which focus on national security issues. For this purpose, content analysis strategy, decision tree logic and network analysis method were used and a conceptual model called "NAZAM" model was introduced, which includes four dimensions and consists of the initials of each dimension, which include insecure factors, security. The results of this study showed that the system's capacity dimension plays a role in the national security coefficient of the Islamic Republic of Iran more than other dimensions. Therefore, if the overall national security strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is focused on increasing capacity, it will have a greater impact than the strategy to deal with insecure factors. Increasing the level of efficiency of the political system, improving the interaction between the three powers, increasing the political trust and social capital of the government, increasing the level of production, repairing the electoral system and increasing Iran's consensus-building power in international organizations, more than control and countermeasures against insecure factors will increase national security.https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_141361_5f16b14e2d82c31755291f40e8b0ec73.pdfResearch Institute of Strategic Studies (RISS)Strategic Studies Quarterly1735-072724320211122Religiousness Developments and the Social Dimension of National Security in IranReligiousness Developments and the Social Dimension of National Security in Iran3164141364FAMohammad RezaPouyafarJournal Article20210811Recognition and analysis of religiousness developments in Iranian society, in addition to being an indicator of cultural and social developments, facilitates a deeper understanding and explanation of changes in other areas, including the social aspect of security, both at the level of public security and in the level of national security. This paper seeks to study the trend of developments in religiosity indicators in its important dimensions and components, to analyze the relationship between these developments in today's Iranian society with the social dimension of national security. Accordingly, the findings obtained in the national surveys, especially during more than four decades of the establishment of the Islamic Republic, have been studied and analyzed. Findings have shown that changes in the religiosity of the Iranian people, as well as their attitudes toward religion, religious institutions and official procedures in religious governance, are moving towards the decline of the status, importance and role of religion in society. Based on the results obtained and the ups and downs of various indicators of religiosity, strategic proposals for optimal policy-making and reform of existing trends have been presentedRecognition and analysis of religiousness developments in Iranian society, in addition to being an indicator of cultural and social developments, facilitates a deeper understanding and explanation of changes in other areas, including the social aspect of security, both at the level of public security and in the level of national security. This paper seeks to study the trend of developments in religiosity indicators in its important dimensions and components, to analyze the relationship between these developments in today's Iranian society with the social dimension of national security. Accordingly, the findings obtained in the national surveys, especially during more than four decades of the establishment of the Islamic Republic, have been studied and analyzed. Findings have shown that changes in the religiosity of the Iranian people, as well as their attitudes toward religion, religious institutions and official procedures in religious governance, are moving towards the decline of the status, importance and role of religion in society. Based on the results obtained and the ups and downs of various indicators of religiosity, strategic proposals for optimal policy-making and reform of existing trends have been presentedhttps://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_141364_6bcad5d1c166ebbaddc6b1758bdb55d2.pdfResearch Institute of Strategic Studies (RISS)Strategic Studies Quarterly1735-072724320211122Objectives of the Security Reference and Reconstruction of National Security Governance in the Discourse of the Islamic RevolutionObjectives of the Security Reference and Reconstruction of National Security Governance in the Discourse of the Islamic Revolution6599141369FAAlirezaKhosraviJournal Article20201220<strong>This article seeks to theoretically examine the national security governance in the discourse of the Islamic Revolution. The author believes that the word governance comes from the context of liberal thought and its use in the intellectual field of the Islamic Republic requires its adaptation to the security authority in the discourse of the Islamic Revolution. The author distinguishes between the security refference and the reffrent object of security and believes that the security refference is manifested in the discourse of the Islamic Revolution in a longitudinal series from God to the Supreme Leader. So that the rule of national security in the Islamic Republic based on the common meaning of good governance, which originally seeks or prioritizes the authority of society and the people, is rejected. To provide the basis for drawing the national security governance of the Islamic Republic, author tries to describe and categorize reffrent objects of security and the security reference in Iran.</strong><strong>This article seeks to theoretically examine the national security governance in the discourse of the Islamic Revolution. The author believes that the word governance comes from the context of liberal thought and its use in the intellectual field of the Islamic Republic requires its adaptation to the security authority in the discourse of the Islamic Revolution. The author distinguishes between the security refference and the reffrent object of security and believes that the security refference is manifested in the discourse of the Islamic Revolution in a longitudinal series from God to the Supreme Leader. So that the rule of national security in the Islamic Republic based on the common meaning of good governance, which originally seeks or prioritizes the authority of society and the people, is rejected. To provide the basis for drawing the national security governance of the Islamic Republic, author tries to describe and categorize reffrent objects of security and the security reference in Iran.</strong>https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_141369_3986d05af5bed76456155cd780ee9ce4.pdfResearch Institute of Strategic Studies (RISS)Strategic Studies Quarterly1735-072724320211122Historiography of Intelligence Organizations: from Strengthening National Identity to a Source for Narrating HistoryHistoriography of Intelligence Organizations: from Strengthening National Identity to a Source for Narrating History101121141370FAGholamrezaSalarkiaJournal Article20210526This study deals with the reasons of historiography of intelligence organization in political systems, a history in which much of it has been hidden from view either because of covert secrecy in intelligence activities or because of political considerations or neglect. In this study, we seek to answer the question, "How does writing and recording the history of intelligence services help national security?" The purpose of this study is to clarify the dimensions of historiography of intelligence organizations and its impact on national security. The required data were collected through secondary sources and then interviews with six experts on the subject were conducted. Data were also analyzed by thematic analysis using open coding, axial coding and selective coding. For this purpose, first the role of intelligence organizations in state craft is discussed and then the seven reasons for the historiography of intelligence organizations that are the result of research are introduced under three main dimensions.This study deals with the reasons of historiography of intelligence organization in political systems, a history in which much of it has been hidden from view either because of covert secrecy in intelligence activities or because of political considerations or neglect. In this study, we seek to answer the question, "How does writing and recording the history of intelligence services help national security?" The purpose of this study is to clarify the dimensions of historiography of intelligence organizations and its impact on national security. The required data were collected through secondary sources and then interviews with six experts on the subject were conducted. Data were also analyzed by thematic analysis using open coding, axial coding and selective coding. For this purpose, first the role of intelligence organizations in state craft is discussed and then the seven reasons for the historiography of intelligence organizations that are the result of research are introduced under three main dimensions.https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_141370_bcdebd2667d264441b3c6d0f74ba2931.pdfResearch Institute of Strategic Studies (RISS)Strategic Studies Quarterly1735-072724320211122A Comparative Study of the Historical Discourse of Imam Khomeini and Ayatollah KhameneiA Comparative Study of the Historical Discourse of Imam Khomeini and Ayatollah Khamenei123156141374FASeyed MassoudMousaviJournal Article20210414With the victory of the Islamic Revolution, many of the dominant discourses in various fields, including historical discourse, changed. Imam Khomeini and Ayatollah Khamenei played a pivotal role in directing this discourse change as the leaders of the Islamic Republic. In the historical discourse of Iran after the revolution, talking about the historical understanding and insight of Imam Khomeini and Ayatollah Khamenei is very important; especially since the insights, methods and values accepted in historiography as well as the historical thinking of some Iranian historians after the revolution have been greatly influenced by their views and approaches. Given the importance of this issue, the present article seeks to answer the question of what is the place of history and historiography in the historical discourse of Imam Khomeini and Ayatollah Khamenei as the leaders of the Islamic Republic. And in the next step in the form of a comparative study, what are the similarities and differences between the historical discourse of these two leaders.With the victory of the Islamic Revolution, many of the dominant discourses in various fields, including historical discourse, changed. Imam Khomeini and Ayatollah Khamenei played a pivotal role in directing this discourse change as the leaders of the Islamic Republic. In the historical discourse of Iran after the revolution, talking about the historical understanding and insight of Imam Khomeini and Ayatollah Khamenei is very important; especially since the insights, methods and values accepted in historiography as well as the historical thinking of some Iranian historians after the revolution have been greatly influenced by their views and approaches. Given the importance of this issue, the present article seeks to answer the question of what is the place of history and historiography in the historical discourse of Imam Khomeini and Ayatollah Khamenei as the leaders of the Islamic Republic. And in the next step in the form of a comparative study, what are the similarities and differences between the historical discourse of these two leaders.https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_141374_79d727020f7a93fdf94d78e544dd8b8b.pdfResearch Institute of Strategic Studies (RISS)Strategic Studies Quarterly1735-072724320211122Cultural Diplomacy and Iran's International StatusCultural Diplomacy and Iran's International Status157188141376FAAbdullahGanbarlooJournal Article20210211Given the cultural-civilizational advantages of Iran, the use of cultural diplomacy can play an important role in improving soft power and securing the national interests of this country. In practice, the results of cultural diplomacy so far have not been satisfactory compared to the huge potential of the country. Despite some important achievements, this diplomacy has not been able to play a strong role in strengthening Iran's "international acceptance" status. Accordingly, the question of the article is why the cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran has not been able to have a significant impact on improving Iran's international status. In response to this question, the article addresses the problems and challenges of Iranian cultural diplomacy. Lack of a coherent strategy, neglect of the private sector, weakness of government agents, overcoming ideological views and the multiplicity of policy institutions are the most important factors involved in weakening the country's cultural diplomacy. This article, after reviewing and analyzing the issues, will reach some suggestions for the efficiency of cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran.Given the cultural-civilizational advantages of Iran, the use of cultural diplomacy can play an important role in improving soft power and securing the national interests of this country. In practice, the results of cultural diplomacy so far have not been satisfactory compared to the huge potential of the country. Despite some important achievements, this diplomacy has not been able to play a strong role in strengthening Iran's "international acceptance" status. Accordingly, the question of the article is why the cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran has not been able to have a significant impact on improving Iran's international status. In response to this question, the article addresses the problems and challenges of Iranian cultural diplomacy. Lack of a coherent strategy, neglect of the private sector, weakness of government agents, overcoming ideological views and the multiplicity of policy institutions are the most important factors involved in weakening the country's cultural diplomacy. This article, after reviewing and analyzing the issues, will reach some suggestions for the efficiency of cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran.https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_141376_8d5a1cf3fd8dbd1ccfc1097006fba804.pdf